Poison intentions? (was Re: What does Snape owe Harry?)

[potioncat]

No: HPFGUIDX 97612

> 
> Caesian apologizes:
> You might have missed my previous post apologizing for not 
checking my source before 
> my off-the-cuff statement about a JKR interview (# 97157).  I do 
apologize. 
snip  
> My very bad.  My first week on the list - oops (potion vial drops 
to floor, I sneer ... no, no, 
> no! I am sincerely sorry.)

Potioncat:
First week on the list and you came up with a post that generated so 
much discussion!  Welcome to the list!  Nothing to apologize for.  
Let me tell you this newby has already seen lots of us (me too) dash 
off a poorly remembered quote. 

BTW, I went back to that post because for some reason I hadn't read 
it either.  And your comments/questions to me were correct. 


Caesian:
  snip
> BBC 02 November 2001 
> Secrets revealed
>>Potioncat snippin parts of this quote  
> I gave Alan Rickman a little bit on Snape," she told Newsround's 
Lizo Mzimba.
>  "But no-one should go out and kidnap them because they won't 
talk!"
> caesian: maybe Carol and I could try capturing Rickman just in 
case? (mad cackle) 

Potioncat: Count me in. ;-) {BTW take a look at HBO's Something the 
Lord Made site for the trailer and Rickman interview.  He says he 
never judges his characters which I found interesting given Snape}

 
> Caesian - who should have thoroughly learned her lesson - never, 
ever poison the original 
> intention of the post (in this case, that Snape probably would 
have poisoned Harry in class 
> - # 97125) with some high-extrapolation at the end.

Potioncat:  
Several of us have found it's the off the cuff, half in jest 
comments that generate the responses rather than the prime reason 
for making a post.  Again, welcome to the list.

Potioncat: who aplogizes if this post is way too OT.