Can a M$^blood even become a pureblood? (From Assumption)
potioncat
willsonkmom at msn.com
Fri May 7 16:40:20 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 97856
>
> Cindy now:
>
> I've always equated the mudblood debate with the slavery debate in
the early
> US. When slavery was legal, there were a number of rules to
determine who
> was Black and who wasn't. The oldest was the Descent Rule, which
said any
> offspring from a mixed union were to be considered Black, and
therefore a
> slave. That was later clarified with the One Drop Rule, which
said if your
> blood was 1/32 Black, you were to be considered Black. That meant
that only
> one of your great-great grandparents had to be Black for you to be
> considered Black, even if you appeared very Caucasian. (Your
kids, though,
> would be White, because they had less than 1/32 of Black blood.)
>
Potioncat:
Yes, that's my closest association as well. But it seems to me that
the WW isn't as strict in their interpretation. They seem pretty
accepting of a child of a witch and wizard, without looking too
closely beyond that. Although how close someone would look might
depend on what the association was to be and who was doing
the "judging." Given the longevity in the WW, you'd think there
would be an old Auntie or a great-great who would remember that so-
and-so's ancester was a Muggle.
Potioncat
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive