Sirius vs. Snape
nkafkafi
nkafkafi at yahoo.com
Tue May 25 21:40:11 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 99418
Kneasy:
<snip>
I don't blame Snape for throwing Harry out.
Just who the hell does Harry think he is? Poking into people's private
affairs, not trying to learn, disobeying not only Snape but DD, never
considering that someone else may know better than he. Obnoxious
little creep. A true Slytherin.
What Harry was taught and how was no business of Sirius. He should
never have intervened with Snape at Grimmauld Place. He's being a
petulant prima donna - again.
Neri:
I apparently wasn't very clear. I'll try again: This is a war. The
whole future of the WW is at stake. Harry learning Occlumency was
thought to be the difference between winning and loosing. Snape knew
it. And still he stopped giving Harry Occlumency lessons just because
the obnoxious, disobedient, inconsiderate (and whatever) Harry peeped
into his memories. Snape got annoyed with an unruly student, so he
knowingly left the most critical and sensitive position of his side
open to the enemy's attack. And you call SIRIUS prima donna?
> Kneasy wrote:
> Yes, Sirius obviously cares for Harry very deeply. He just has a
funny
> way of showing it sometimes.
>
> Neri:
> Yeah, I know. Like rushing to save Harry's life (and the life of
five
> other kids) in the DoM against a superior force of DEs. You won't
> catch "watch-dog" Snape doing such a funny thing.
>
Kneasy:
Yes. Rushing off, disregarding all blandishments and where did it get
him? The final curtain. Sirius cocks it up again.<snip>
Neri:
I'll try clarifying this too. Sirius didn't "cock it up". He achieved
precisely what he went out to do: preventing four other Order members
and six kids (including Harry) from getting killed AND preventing the
prophecy from falling into Voldy's hand. The final curtain wasn't a
failure. It was just a price that he was ready to pay for achieving
this goal. He would have rather not paid it, but he knew that he
might have to. Do you think he was not aware of it when he "rushed
off"?
The funny thing is, I'm not even a Sirius fan. I didn't feel sad when
he died, and I always thought that it was convenient for JKR to get
rid of him because she didn't manage to develop him properly as a
character. I also like to read about Snape, and I think he is a much
more complex and interesting character than Sirius (and their sex-
appeal isn't a factor for me...). It is just that I like to get my
terms straight. What is a responsible person? It's a person that
estimates the importance of the situation at hand, knows what are the
possible consequences, what are the risks, weights them against each
other and makes the correct decision, whatever it takes. What is an
irresponsible person? It's a person that estimates the importance of
the situation at hand, knows what are the possible consequences, what
are the risks, and then acts by his emotions.
Perhaps I just think so because I had to spend a year or two in a war
zone. If I had to choose who I want to cover my flank, Sirius or
Snape, I wouldn't hesitate even a single second deciding.
Neri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive