Occlumency was RE: Sirius vs. Snape
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Wed May 26 17:31:00 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 99499
> Snow:
> Did you ever consider the possibility that this whole
occlumency thing could have very well been created by DD for
the specific purpose of using Snape and his pencieve memory
purely for Harry's emotional response? Nothing else was
obtained by the actual lessons.
> When DD learned about Snape's refusal to further teach Harry,
DD did not pursue it. Could that have been because the lesson
that needed to be taught, was taught? (IMO) <
Dumbledore says at the end that it was a matter of great urgency
that Harry master Occlumency and that it was a mistake for him
not to have taught Harry himself. So I think the lessons were a
genuine attempt. But I also think they were stopped purposefully.
I mean, the more I think about that set up with the Pensieve, the
more it smells. Harry is careless, and so he never thinks it's
significant when someone else makes a careless mistake. But
Snape is obsessively *not* careless--it's what makes him an
excellent potion maker and a successful spy. Do we really
believe that he was so distracted by Montague's plight that he
ran out of his office leaving Potter and a Pensieve full of highly
dangerous memories behind him?
There's a lot about the Occlumency lessons that we don't know.
Harry was having them every week, but we see only three or four.
The impression is that Snape discovered Harry's vision of
Rookwood, Dumbledore decided Occlumency was more
important than ever, and Snape threw him out the very next
lesson.
But in between is the chapter about Firenze, where he tells Harry
that Hagrid's attempt is not working and it should be abandoned.
Dumbledore is forced from office. March blurs into April. Harry is
still constantly dreaming about the corridor and still dwelling on
his dream of being Voldemort. And there may have been more
than one. Canon is vague about it. We don't actually know how
many lessons or visions there were between the Rookwood
vision and Harry's look into Snape's past.
But we do get a hint that an attempt which is not working may be
abandoned. It could be that Dumbledore realized the lessons
weren't working and instructed Snape to find a way to abandon
them without causing Harry to ruminate on why they had
failed--lest Voldemort dwell on this too. Why reveal a weakness
to the enemy?
Of course Snape does seem really angry with Harry when he
finds him in his memories. But you don't have to be a devotee of
MAGIC DISHWASHER to notice that Snape goes on the warpath
in situations where it would be very inconvenient for him to
answer questions.
IMO, he doesn't want to tell Harry *why* he's stopping
Occlumency, so he arranges to fly into a towering rage instead.
Of course he couldn't have planned for Montague to turn up when
he did, but Snape could have taken advantage of it to do
something he was planning to do already. Let Potter see what
his sainted father was really like, and at the same time, end the
lessons in such a way that Harry will not wonder if his failure to
learn is what caused it.
Of course Dumbledore couldn't tell Harry all this without
admitting how closely he and Snape are working together. It's
not time for that yet.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive