Good moral core (Re: Dirty Harry/Clean Harry)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 2 15:46:38 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 117063
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "nkafkafi" <nkafkafi at y...> >
Neri:
> The problem with both nature and nurture is that they discount the
> free will.
SNIP.
Both LV and Harry have free
> will. LV is evil because he decided to be evil. Harry is good
because
> he decided to be good. To ask for either nature or nurture reasons
> would be discounting their free will.
Alla:
I agree very much, BUT Harry was so very young,when his parents died,
same with Tom Riddle when he was given to the orphanage. They must
have had some examples, I don't know some REASONS to become good or
evil. Am I being confusing?
Free will is wonderful, but how can two year old or three year old
decide something that big without outside examples or reasons?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive