The intended murder of Pettigrew and moral corruption (Was; Vengeance on Sna
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Nov 2 16:29:27 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 117067
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
>
>
> Magda:
> > No it wouldn't. The MOM is far too attached to its
preconceived notions - and besides, they'd still have Sirius
pegged as the killer of a dozen muggles. What had to be proved
was that Peter was capable of killing all those people and a
dead Peter wasn't any good for
that.
>
>
> Alla:
>
> But we don't know, right? Who knows, maybe one person in
MoM decided to do his/her duty and try to question the story.<
You mean like Shacklebolt and Tonks in OOP? Obviously they
believed Sirius was innocent, but if they'd said so out loud, they'd
have been sacked. And if Sirius had been caught they couldn't
have saved him. Questioning him under veritaserum wouldn't
have proved anything to the Ministry, because the Ministry
believed Sirius was out of his mind.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive