Unreliable narrator (Was: Snape's stalling)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Nov 9 23:00:31 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 117497
>
> Neri:
>
> At the risk of repeating my repetitions of myself, I must
maintain that my analysis of the night of the MoM battle raises at
least as much suspicion against Snape.<
Okay, now I get it. You're saying that Rowling may have hidden a
clue about Snape in the same manner as I contend she has
hidden clues about Lupin, and I, in my pro-Snape bias, failed to
give the possibility due weight.
You could be right, in which case you have discovered a genuine
red herring (assuming that Snape is not ESE!) and I take off my
virtual hat to you.
Of course if a character points out that it was a far more serious
fault than Harry imagines for Snape not to go to the forest in
immediate pursuit, that will only point up that it was a far more
serious fault than Harry imagines for Lupin not to tell what he
knew about Sirius, the map, or the unguarded secret entrance
into the castle. It will, BTW, emphasize that the narrator is
unreliable, in not bringing these faults to our attention as they
occurred.
You see, I really *am* interested in narrative technique, though I
will admit that sometimes my biases get in the way.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive