Occlumency: Relax or resist?
SongBird3411 at aol.com
SongBird3411 at aol.com
Wed Nov 10 07:46:25 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 117531
Hello! I am delurking for a bit, though it feels rather strange. I
have been catching up on a few weeks of posts, so I apologize for
bringing up an older post. But, as it is just from last weekend, I
felt it wasn't too old.
The reason I love reading this list is because frequently members
post ideas or perspectives I hadn't considered before. Usually, I
just think, "Wow, that is interesting", then move on. However, I
have some free time tonight, so I thought I would respond. Sorry
that it is a bit of a "me too" post.
> Carol wrote:
> I think we know a great deal about how Occlumency works, and we can
> see when and why Harry fails or gets it right. Before the first
> lesson, Snape tells him what he needs to do--*not* relax but to
> *resist*--to protect his mind from intrusion as he did with the
> Imperius Curse (534).
Now me, Mindy: I wanted to thank Carol for bringing up this idea.
For around a year now, I have heard people say that Harry needed to
relax to learn Occlumency and it always bothered me. I too got the
impression that Snape was telling Harry to focus on resisting. As he
did with the Imperius Curse. Harry had to clear his mind to deflect
that curse too. Clear it in order to focus on deflecting, really.
That does seem remarkably similar to what he was supposed to do with
Occlumency. Stop letting emotion get in the way and focus on
resisting. I thought Carol did quite a nice job in using canon
quotes to support this idea.
Of course, Snape is one of my favorite characters, so I admit to some
bias. However, I am fully willing to admit that Snape is sometimes
quite a nasty and bitter man. Those Occlumency lessons were not
examples those times, IMO.
Recently here I read a post from someone claiming Snape was torturing
Harry in those lessons. (Sorry don't remember specific post
number.) I believe this is a common idea. However, after some
thought, I think that in many ways Snape's Occlumency lessons were
little different than Lupin's Patronus lessons. Gasp! Yes, I did
just say that.
Here are some common complaints: "Snape didn't tell Harry how he was
supposed to stop the Legilimency." Well, I am not so sure Lupid did
that bang up of a job at first either. He has Harry practice without
even a Boggart to start with. Harry says the incantation a few times
and produces something that "looked like a wisp of silver gas" (POA,
Scholastic Hardcover pg 238). From what we now know of the Patronus
Charm, that certainly doesn't seem like Harry has mastered the
defense. Yet, Lupin then opened the case and let the Boggart out.
When Harry inevitably fails, Lupin says he didn't expect Harry to do
it the first time anyway. Snape told Harry that the defense was
similar to how he resisted the Imperius Curse. Probably not the most
helpful information. Yet, is it really all that *less* helpful than
Lupin's preparation? Especially with Snape's follow-ups to focus,
clear his mind, and control his emotions, etc.
"Snape subjected Harry to pain". In Harry's first Patronus lesson he
is subjected to the memories of the murder of his parents three
times. He collapses twice. Is in tears at least once. The only
difference I see here is that Harry asked to continue with the
Patronus lessons, while Snape didn't give Harry the option of
quitting. Surely, the memories of the murder of his parents count as
being traumatic just as much as the memories of the awful treatment
he received at the Dursleys as well as the other memories he
experienced in Occlumency lessons?
I guess I could go on, but I think I made my point. I just don't see
how Harry was any better prepared to start learning the Patronus
Charm than he was to learn Occlumency. Doesn't sound like facing the
Boggart was any less traumatic than facing Legilimens Snape. I mean,
unlike Neville, Harry's biggest fear is the Dementor, not Snape. So,
wouldn't facing the Dementor be even worse than facing Snape?
Seems to me like the only difference was that Harry didn't *want* to
learn Occlumency. In fact, part of Harry didn't want to learn the
Patronus Charm either. Several sessions into the lessons, Harry can
only produce an "indistinct, silvery shadow" and he felt "guilty
about his secret desire to hear his parents' voices again" (POA, 245-
246). So, his partial desire to keep hearing the voices was
interfering with his learning how to properly cast the charm.
Similarly, his desire to keep seeing the visions of Voldemort's
doings prevented him from properly learning how to perform Occlumency.
Granted, another difference between the lessons is Harry's differing
feelings towards Snape and Lupin as people. And Snape's and Lupin's
feelings towards Harry.
I guess what I am saying is that I can't quite credit the idea that
Snape was torturing Harry in those lessons, when the technique was
essentially the same as Lupin's. The effects of the first lessons
were seemingly equally debilitating. Yet, I doubt anyone would claim
Lupin was torturing Harry. (Well, except maybe Pippin. Has Pippin
put forward anything along those lines? Can't remember, sorry.) We
saw Lupin teach the Patronus Charm by having Harry confront the
Boggart/Dementor. We saw Snape attempt to teach Harry Occlumency by
confronting him with Legilimency. BTW, we also saw Crouch!Moody
teach Harry how to resist the Imperius Curse by confronting him with
Imperio. There didn't seem to be any outrage or shock from the
faculty after that. Perhaps this is common teaching practice in
attempting to teach difficult magic or skills. Or rather, magic or
skills that work better when the student is directly threatened. The
trick is to put the threat into a controlled environment.
My first 2 knuts on the list.
Mindy- who also wants to thank Carol for later presenting the idea
that Harry wasn't allowed to remove memories in the Occlumency
lessons because Dumbledore, via Snape, wanted to find out what kinds
of visions Voldemort might be implanting in Harry's mind. Fun idea!
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive