Harry's moral core vs. Voldie's
ginnysthe1
ginnysthe1 at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 15 19:51:10 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 117926
Quick note from Kim:
Snow wrote:
>Ditto on the mothering attributes...if this is what actually
happened? But... Young Tom Riddle was fed information about his
early family, as was Harry. We know that Harry's information about
his parents demise was falsified, why not Tom's? What do we actually
know about Tom's parents? His father was rich and as snobbish as they
come and his maternal grandfather's name was Marvolo who was a
descendant of Salazar Slytherin. Everything else is conjecture!
DiaryTom claims may not be substantiated. Yes, someone, presumably
the orphanage, told Tom that his mother told them what his name was
to be etc., but Harry was also told that 'his' parents died in a car
crash. Harry believed his parents fate until he was told and proven
otherwise. Likewise, I believe that Tom under similar (in a way best
representative of the current circumstance) was told something to
appease his questioning. Tom believed what he was told, as did Harry,
and both were lied to for rationalizing purposes. I personally
believe that Tom's mother lived, and may still be living, but was
forced to choose between her son and his rejecting father or her
wizarding world connection with the last of the pure royalty line of
Slytherin.<
>I am curious why everyone appears to take young Tom Riddle's facts,
as were given to Tom at a young age, so seriously? This is muggle
world (orphanage) vs. wizarding world, the Harry/Dursley world vs.
the Dumbledore/wizarding world. The out and out lies of a muggle
world that does not want to accept the wizarding world compared to
the truth, and all it entails, that has been denied to both Harry and
Tom; the wizarding world. ... Harry and Tom are more alike than maybe
we realize or would like to admit. What is the difference between
them and especially their mothers? ... It is the lack of information
about Tom's mother and her past that allows me to question young
Tom's beliefs that had been told to him. We, the readers, have at
least been aloud a glimpse into what Harry's mother Lily was like
through the eyes of her friends and teachers but the absence of Tom's
mother's former information leaves me in denial of a truthful
explanation from Tom's caretakers let alone to believe young Tom's
second hand knowledge of the so called events.<
Kim here: Ditto to Snow's ideas! I read her post after posting
117924 to Geoff on the same topic. I agree though that it's nice to
think of Tom's mother loving her husband and son so much, but there's
nothing in canon to say yay or nay to that idea. Somehow though, I
think that if Tom Riddle's dying mother (if in fact she did die; as
Snow suggests, she might still be alive) had so loved her son, and
perhaps still loved the father of her son too, even though she died
right after giving birth to baby Tom, that some of that love might
have remained with Tom as he grew up. It's only a maybe, of course.
But we certainly haven't seen even the smallest inkling of the
experience of that love in the behavior of grown-up Tom, Lord
Voldemort. Was it too little love, too long ago? Anyhow, I sure
hope we find out some of the answers in HBP -- inquiring minds really
want to know. ;-)
Kim (who isn't a mother, but who does appreciate the feelings of
those who are)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive