[HPforGrownups] Trusting characters Re: bullies? twins, padfoot and prongs

[kim reynolds]

No: HPFGUIDX 118894

arrowsmithbt <arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com> wrote:

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "nkafkafi" <nkafkafi at y...> wrote:
> 
> Neri:
> Do you mean that some characters ARE actually trustworthy? Wow! I 
> didn't expect such trust from Kneasy... I wonder which characters do 
> you include in this category, and how do you assess their 
> trustworthiness.


Tsk, tsk, tsk.
What it is to be considered unremittingly paranoid.
Sometimes, yes, always, no.

You want a list? OK. Mind you, this is compiled on the understanding
that if new information appears all bets are off and a searching
re-assessment takes place. Oh, and being Imperioed can happen
to even the most trustworthy types and so isn't taken into
consideration.

Major characters:

DD -  sneaky, devious as hell, manipulative, but a goody
Moody
Molly
Arthur
Ron 
Hermione - unless someone sneaky offers to free the Elves
in return for a small favour
Neville
MM
Hagrid
Snape - yes, he can be trusted 100%
Lupin -  90% sure
Peter - 50/50 at the moment

Those I don't trust:
Harry - he's got a bit of Voldy in his head
Sirius
Bagman
Fudge
Lockhart

Lucius Malfoy is a special case - he can't be trusted to stay evil.

The other baddies can be trusted to stay bad, I think.

Although I've given a list, that doesn't mean that I won't offer
theories or suppositions that may appear to conflict with it.
Theorising is what I  do - I don't necessarily believe any theory
I post; never have done, and I've said so before. So I'll keep on
churning out ideas shocking or mundane just for the fun of it.
Be prepared.

Small question for Kneasy:

Lockhart on your list of untrustworthies --- is that because you think he may be faking his memory loss?

Kim


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]