Harry learning from Snape (was: stopper death)
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 1 19:32:18 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 114403
> SSSusan:
> <snip> so if things are going to change, I think Harry will simply
> have to decide, "Hey, we're supposedly on the same side. It's
> going to kill me, but I'm going to SHUT OUT all the crap he throws
> at me, and just work. I'm going to SHOW HIM that I'm not a stupid,
> arrogant, strutting git."
>
> Harry has learned *some* from Snape, but (again, understandably,
> imo) he's not learned all he could because of the "stuff" that's
> gotten in the way. I want to see Harry work around the "stuff" and
> prove he is becoming a mature man who knows that he MUST master his
> emotions and take responsibility for learning what he needs to learn.
Why should Harry have to be the one to do that? Snape is the adult
and the teacher in that situation. He should be the one to swallow
his attitude and buckle down. Why doesn't Dumbledore sit the man
down and tell him to stop acting like a whiny first year and teach
Harry without the attitude or the attempts at failing him? For gods
sake, Dumbledore put a man in charge of Harry's education who wants
Harry to fail. Harry may need to take responsibility for his
learning, and he should, but Snape needs to take his responsiblility
as his teacher seriously. (hee, I actually wrote siriusly and had to
go back and change it) What I want to see in the next book is
Dumbledore grow a spine when it comes to Snape and make him treat
Harry better.
"phoenixgod2000"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive