Snape--Abusive?

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 114764


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dzeytoun" <dzeytoun at c...> 
wrote:
> But he wasn't going to forgo vengeance on Pettigrew, Pippin, he 
was 
> going to send him to Azkaban.  That's hardly forgoing vengeance, 
or 
> justice as the case may be.  Now, it's true he believed that there 
> are certain places you shouldn't go for justice/vengeance, and I'm 
> sure that he still believes that.  Which is probably going to be a 
> big deal for him as he wrestles with having to kill Pettigrew.
> 
> It would be an enormous disappointment for me if he did not put 
Snape 
> in his place in some appropriate fashion.  That doesn't mean I 
think 
> he should kill Snape.  But just as he was ready to appropriately 
> punish Pettigrew by sending him to Azkaban, I expect him to 
> appropriately punish Snape for his behavior.  Public humiliation 
> would probably be best.
> 



Alla:

All true , Dzeytoun, and as I said if Snape does not see Harry for 
Harry at the end, not Harry as James, I am all for Snape's 
humiliation. I think Harry saving his life will be 
perfect,ESPECIALLY if Harry will do it with the best intentions in 
mind - not wanting to humiliate Snape , but to keep him alive.

Of course Snape being Snape will misunderstand that and will decide 
that he owes a lifedebt to Potter again. :o)

I just hope that Harry will not give him ANY chance to pay such debt 
back. :)

I REALLY want Harry to survive at the end, but in such scenario 
Harry's death will be good punishment for Snape.

If he lives, I hope he keeps his kids as far from Snape as 
possible. :o)
Send them to Durmstrang or Beaubaxton, Harry. :o)



But, when push comes to shove, I am a little bit more optimistic 
than you, Dzeytoun. I still have faith that grudging respect may 
develop between Harry and Snape at the end.