Snape--Abusive?
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 5 03:04:27 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 114784
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999" <foxmoth at q...>
wrote:
I would not
> like to see Harry become a public humiliator just for revenge
> either. It wouldn't cure Snape, or at least it hasn't yet--and how
on
> earth could JKR top the boggart scene anyway?
Alla:
The point then would not be curing Snape, Pippin. The point will be
effective "payback" and I would argue that Harry saving Snape would
BE effective payback, since Snape's pride will BE hurt.
I will NEVER advocate revenge in RL, but some kind of revenge in
fiction - sure.
Pippin:
> Where do the books indicate that it is appropriate for someone
> who does not have lawful authority to punish anyone -- isn't that
> what we're complaining about when we say Snape abuses his
> power?
>
Alla:
Well, it looks like Snape's "crimes" are not those which are
punishable under WW law, they are more, I'd say crimes of morality.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive