What's wrong with Mean!Snape ?
Nora Renka
nrenka at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 9 14:30:28 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 115281
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999" <foxmoth at q...>
wrote:
> Some of us might find it entertaining to see Snape accepted for
> what he is. Perhaps he doesn't deserve it, but tolerance seems
> to be the theme here, not retribution.
>
> There's a useful analogy with Buckbeak. Like Snape, Buckbeak
> makes no allowances for childhood and will savagely attack
> anyone who offends him, regardless of the seriousness of the
> offense. Not only that, to treat him courteously violates a
> common notion of propriety; he's a brute beast and surely
> humans should not bow to beasts. But those who are willing to
> accede to the demands of Buckbeak's nature will gain a useful
> and powerful companion, while those who refuse are likely
> to get their arms ripped half off.
>
> Readers understand that because Buckbeak couldn't behave
> otherwise without becoming something other than a hippogriff,
> punishment would be useless and unjust.
It's an interesting analogy, Pippin, but it does has a major
weakness, as I'm sure you know--mainly the difference between human
and hippogriff.
One famous old definition (Harry Frankfurt's) of 'personhood' is the
ability to have second-order desires; to have a desire about the
desires that one has. Easier to give an example: to have the wish to
*want* to do good things for other people. I don't think Buckbeak is
capable of that, while I do think Snape is.
I think tolerance is an important issue, and I think there *are*
lessons to be learned about allowing Snape to be himself. On the
other hand, I think there is a reciprocal issue--Snape learning that
he shouldn't always treat people as he does. I keep coming back to
problems of liberalism, but 'you gotta get along to go along' is one
of them.
I'm unresolved on the issue of whether Snape is capable of change.
Feeling somewhat optimistic, I would like to hope that he is. But
I'm almost tempted to sit down and try to construct out an IF/THEN
flowchart of all the possibilities of motivations and outcomes that
we've all argued about over the years, because some of them are
mutually contradictory--and if we try to accept all of them, we get
PreposterouslyCompetent!Snape. That is to say, Snape who is very
deeply damaged and cannot help his behavior towards the kids, BUT
he's also really just doing it out of frustration and also trying to
help them along as he's completely aware of the importance of Harry
AND he always has their best interests in mind; he's emotionally
damaged from abuse BUT is still perfectly in control of his emotions
to succeed as a spy...
I bet there's one piece of missing information that would trigger a
cascade of 'Oh, that's it?'
-Nora hopes that the new book comes out at a good time, not exams,
please not during exams...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive