LV Inmortality
mhbobbin
mhbobbin at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 11 10:12:31 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 115394
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "jlnbtr" <jlnbtr at y...> wrote:
>
> First of all, hi everyone. I'm a new member of this group and may
I
> say this is exactly what I've been looking for as a huge HP fan.
>
> I have a theory regarding DD's sparks when Harry tells him that
LV
> took some of his blood. In SS when Hagrid first meets Harry and
tells
> him about LV he says he doesn't think LV dead for he is not enough
> human. What if by taking Harry's blood he becomes "more human"?
This
> would mean that as a human he could be killed for good.
>
> jlnbtr
mhbobbin:
Do you mean his "triumphant gleam"? (Or tell me about "sparks" so
to be sure I'm on the same page.) I think that you are on to
something. Hagrid says early in SS that " ...he [LV] didn't have
enough human left in him to die" which supports that theory. On the
other hand, Hagrid is best at being a source of repeating general
views of the WW rather than real knowledge.
Now, why didn't DD try to kill LV in his duel with him in the MoM--
(not obviously when Harry was possessed by LV) if he thought that LV
might now be slightly mortal? Does DD really put that much faith in
a prophecy that indicates Harry must be the Vanquisher? Hasn't DD
worked to that point to convince Harry (and us) that predicting the
future is at best an inexact skill?
mhbobbin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive