DD and the rat (was:Re: Minerva McGonagall-/Dumbledore)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Oct 14 20:40:14 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 115596
> HunterGreen:
> .. if Dumbledore knew about the switch and knew Peter was
the secret- keeper, why did Voldemort find out? Why wouldn't
Dumbledore guard Peter, or go to James and Lily and insist they
changed the SK to him? Whatever happened because of it,
Dumbledore did *not* want Voldemort going to the Potter's
house. Even if he was willing to sacrifice James and
Lily, the chances of Harry getting killed were too high.<
>
>
> Carolyn:
> All I hear here is extreme worries that Dumbledore might not
be as 'good' as you, and many others, want him to be. What I
think is closer to the truth is that he trusts almost no one, and is
old enough to have seen just about everything human nature is
capable of, including many shades of weakness and betrayal.
>
> What canon says is, in the words of Fudge: 'DD..had a number
of useful spies..One of them tipped him off, and he alerted
James & Lily at once...told them that their best chance was the
Fidelius Charm'.
> What Sirius says is: 'I persuaded Lily & James to change to
Peter at the last moment'..
>
> There is no canon to suggest that Peter went directly to
Dumbledore, and I think DD guessed what had happened after
it was too late to act. McGonagall says 'James Potter told
Dumbledore that Black would die rather than tell where they
were...and yet, Dumbledore remained worried.' Sirius and Lupin
admit at the Shrieking Shack that they suspected each other of
being the spy that Dumbledore had detected in their ranks.
>
Pippin:
That isn't quite it, though. *James* and Sirius suspected Lupin of
being the spy -- that was why they didn't tell him about the switch.
But they did tell him that Sirius would be the secret keeper. This
information was clearly *supposed* to get to Voldemort, via
Lupin.
Sirius was to go into hiding, in the hopes that Voldemort would
be misled. Even if Sirius were captured, he could not betray the
secret. Voldemort would only believe that Sirius was holding out.
But I think Lily, champion of the downtrodden, wanted to prove to
Lupin that she trusted him. She told him about the switch. Lupin,
who IMO was indeed the spy, betrayed Peter to Voldemort, with
the promise that Lily would be spared. Peter was captured,
broken and marked, I would guess, a few hours before Godric's
Hollow.
Peter must have thought that Sirius was the spy after all...who
else knew that he, Peter, had been the secret keeper? But that
information is Peter's death warrant --Traitor!Sirius can't afford to
let Peter live. Peter must have made his plans quickly. He'd let
Sirius draw, shout out "Lily and James, how could you?" and turn
himself into a rat, leaving a severed finger behind to show that
he had died in the explosion. Possibly he had a Filibuster
Firework behind his back, not a wand. If all went well,
Traitor!Sirius would be blamed for the deaths of the Potters as
he deserved to be.
But then Peter learned that there was evidence that Sirius was
planning to reveal himself on the occasion of the Potters' deaths.
This made no sense to Peter, and neither did the deaths of the
Muggles. A Filibuster Firework wouldn't have done that. And why
do the secret keeper switch if Sirius was going to out himself
anyway? Perhaps Lupin tried to kill him and the missed AK blew
up the street, and killed those Muggles. Maybe they're *all* spies.
Peter had no intention of returning to Voldemort, but he couldn't
disappear altogether either. Sirius was safe in Azkaban, but
Peter couldn't be sure his charade had convinced Lupin. Let the
Dark Lord grow strong enough to protect his allies once more,
and Peter will be toast. So Peter ensconced himself at the
Weasleys, there to await developments. That way he would know
if the Dark Lord showed signs of stirring again, without the
danger of hiding among Death Eaters.
But when Lupin and Sirius forced Peter out of hiding, he had no
choice but to turn to the Dark Lord for protection from his old
friends. This answers another question; why, now that Peter has
lent Voldemort a hand, is the Dark Lord still keeping him
around? Surely he's more liability than asset...unless the Dark
Lord needs Peter as blackmail material to keep Lupin in line.
This fits very nicely with Peter's protestations, and the questions
he can't or isn't allowed to answer about why he went into hiding
after GH. It makes sense out of Fudge's account and
Dumbledore's belief that Sirius must be guilty.
I don't think there was any way Dumbledore knew about the rat.
Even if Dumbledore went to Azkaban and interviewed Sirius,
would Sirius have revealed that he, James and Peter were
animagi if he thought it would get Lupin in trouble?
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive