The Mark, was Re: Snape:second chance?
sevenhundredandthirteen
sevenhundredandthirteen at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 17 00:37:35 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 115728
Amanda wrote:
> <snip>
> > I also think that if Voldemort ever truly dies, they will, too;
> which is one
> > reason Voldemort was so angry in the graveyard in GoF--he *knew*
> they knew
> > he wasn't dead, so why had nobody been looking for him? No
wonder he was
> > pissed.
>
> Annemehr:
> I like this theory; it does sound very Voldemorty, doesn't it? The
> weak point, though, is that if true, I think the Death Eaters would
> have acted very differently when Voldemort was vaporised. Wouldn't
> they *all* have been looking for him, then, to treat him with the
> utmost TLC just to make sure they themselves survived? After all,
if
> LV would just have slowly faded away, then so would they.
>
> Or am I missing something?
Laurasia:
It also makes you wonder how he can kill his own Death Eaters, eg.
Regulus Black. I would think that if their lives were bound together
Voldemort wouldn't be able to risk killing so many of them, and
quite casually too. Like the way he casually comments at his
Rebirthday Party that "the one who has left him forever" will be
killed, of course. Maybe Voldemort can remove the mark when he
chooses to and break the death sharing, however Regulus was not
killed personally by Voldemort.
We might also assume the inverse relationship- that if all of
Voldemort's Death Eaters are killed, he too dies.
This idea also makes you wonder if any of them we forced to bear the
mark and after realising that their lives were bound to Voldemort's
they *had* to help him.
~<(Laurasia)>~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive