How and when did Snape learn Occlumency ?

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 116510




Nora:

> Perhaps the fact that Snape *is* a good Occlumens is a clue that 
he's 
> more of number two in fact...which sits uneasily with a whole lot 
of 
> more obvious readings of the text, which *may* be a sign that 
we're 
> going to get some canonical subversion of the more overt reading, 
but 
> there's so much work to *do* to accomplish that...
> 
> I remain, as always, cheerfully agnostic.  :)
>


Alla:

Not just good Occlumenc, a "superb" Occlumenc, he is :) 

Hmmm, Nora, Occlumenc must be good with his emotions, too true. But 
here we go again back to whether Snape wins an Oscar or he does not.

To me Shrieking Shack and end of Occlumency look indeed as genuine 
rage,as I said many times.

Since I don't question the fact of Snape being a superb occlumence, 
I must somehow put the two together and I don't know how.

Help me, would you? Could it be that good Occlumenc does not require 
full relaxaion indeed?