CHAPTER DISCUSSION: Chapter 29, Career Advice

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 116623


Carol:

Please don't put words in my mouth and please read the
> evidence I presented regarding Hermione's reaction and Harry's 
anger
> at her, neither of which points to Snape breaking the vial.


Alla:

Ooops, soory.


But neither of those evidence points to Snape NOT breaking the vial. 
Hermione is angry at herself that she cleaned up Harry's cauldron, 
therefore he could not give the second vial to Snape. it has NOTHING 
to do with first part of the act - Snape allegedly breaking the vial.


Carol:
> 
> Most people posting to this thread are assuming that because, in 
their
> view, Snape is an "unprofessional git," he must have broken the 
vial
> on purpose. I think that Snape would be risking his job if he were 
to
> break a vial in front of his students.


Alla:


Yes, because it would be very IC action for him, IMO. Also, he 
already committed even more serious wrongdoings as to Harry for 
which he did not lose his job, I don't see why he would over this.

 
Regardless, as I told Potioncat - it is apossibility that someone 
else did it, I just think that it is a tiny one.