Dirty Harry / 'Good' Harry (WAS: The intended murder of Pettigrew and

[potioncat]

No: HPFGUIDX 116721


-- 
> Alla:
> 
> I don't think he should feel any remorse about it(or at least not 
> much) That is the case of good intentions excusing formal breaking 
> the rules, IMO.
> 
> They were trying to catch the real Heir of Slytherin. If for that, 
> they stole ingredients from Snape's office, wich I doubt that 
Snape 
> would have given them,even if they asked nicely, it is very 
excusable 
> in my book.

Potioncat:
I agree.  Stealing the supplies was a very appropriate, Slytherin 
thing to do and nothing to feel remorse for.

However, had what's his name (Crabbe or Goyle) been injured when the 
firecracker exploded, that would be a different story.

Potioncat, who needs to go back and read the earlier posts in this 
thread.