Lupin visiting Sirius in Azkaban
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Wed Sep 1 20:46:07 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 111814
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Kathi Russell"
<krussell98 at c...> wrote:
>
> It does seem, on the surface, to make NO sense whatsoever,
for DD to not have investigated the events at GH more
thouroughly and to be more certain of Sirius' guilt. Knowing DD
as we _think_ we do, it in no way adds up to a logical chain of
events.
>
What was there to investigate, though? James and Lily had been
in hiding for a week. So had Sirius and Peter. No one had seen
them, so there were no witnesses to their movements prior to
the attack on the Potters. Lupin would testify that the Potters had
intended to choose Sirius as their secret keeper, and there were
all those Muggles saying they'd seen Sirius attack Peter.
Dumbledore could have interviewed Sirius, but I can think of a
good reason why he didn't. We know that before the attack on
the Potters, Dumbledore already suspected that Sirius might be
the traitor.
That means that he felt Sirius was capable of lying to him. He
must have suspected that Sirius was an Occlumens, and
probably a Legilimens as well.
Dumbledore was the only one who knew the precautions which
he had taken to protect baby Harry, and how they might be
defeated. It would not be a good thing for that knowledge to fall
into the hands of Voldemort's second-in-command. Whatever
Sirius learned from Dumbledore, he might pass to others or to
the Dementors, whom Dumbledore considered Voldemort's
natural allies.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive