Snape and DADA
eloise_herisson
eloiseherisson at aol.com
Sat Sep 4 20:13:46 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 112065
Magda Grantwich:
>
> > The worst in Snape is his inability to understand people. He
> > consistently assumes the worst of others <snip>
Nora:
> Let me say first of all that I think the analysis here is really
> perceptive, and I like it quite a bit. This is, perhaps, something
> where JKR will hit us with something more subtle than the basic
idea
> that you don't want someone who was deeply involved *in* the Dark
> Arts teaching about them, because the pull to become re-involved in
> them is too strong.
Magda Grantwich:
> <snip>
>
> > Should he become DADA professor, he would view his task as
training
> > a miniature army of aurors, without regard for their youth, their
> > innocence or their human tendency to make mistakes. <snip>
Nora:
> It also seems to me that this is akin to one of the tendencies of
> what we've seen so far as the Dark Arts--they are arts of
domination
> and control over other people.
<snip>
I've had problems snipping here. I think that all of this is spot on
character analysis. However, it doesn't really (for me anyway) answer
the question I was trying to ask. Which is why I've left in too much
but not enough. ;-)
If the worst of Snape is his inability to empathise with or
understand others, a tendency to assume the worst of others, why
could JKR not say so? What could that possibly give away about the
next two books? Even if it the fact that Dumbledore thought it would
give him too much opportunity to dominate or control, I don't really
see that that isn't something that we couldn't have worked out
relatively easily.
What JKR's statement suggest to me is that we are going to find out
something about Snape which is going to be of great
significance. Whether that is simply something about Snape himself of
whether it is something about Snape's part in the developing action
is the question and I suppose it must be the latter.
I'll throw another of his personality traits into the mix: a tendency
to go it alone, which combined with a certain secrecy and assumption
that he knows best, better even than Dumbledore on occasion, could
lead him to be a bit of a loose cannon. Would his specialising in
DADA encourage this?
Or are we going to see the Darker side of Snape's personality trying
to assert itself in any case, DADA or no? Are we going to see him
being drawn back towards the Dark Arts? Has he ever truly left them
behind? I think not, although I don't believe he still practises. OK,
maybe he still shoots flies for fun. Did Dumbledore suspect that for
Snape, teaching DADA would cause him a massive conflict as he
equipped his students to fight against his own preferred form of
magic?
Perhaps we *will* see him teach DADA and JKR is intending to show us
the consequences; that would certainly be a reason for not telling us
what they were. I hope it's more complicated than his using an
Unforgivable on Harry (or Neville) though.
Of course that reminds me that we *have* seen Snape teach DADA and
that it did bring out if not the worst in him, then something pretty
close: he used it as a way to try and expose Lupin. And in the matter
of Lupin, he was both arrogantly disregardful of Dumbledore's opinion
and acting on his own, arguably as a loose cannon. It's a pattern of
behaviour which I fear we'll see again.
~Eloise
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive