Lupin visiting Sirius in Azkaban
naamagatus
naama_gat at hotmail.com
Sun Sep 5 07:34:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 112106
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "kiricat2001" <Zarleycat at a...>
wrote:
<snip>
>
> Sorry, it doesn't wash for me. If DD can be so trusting of others,
> even former DEs, to give them second chances, then surely he'd show
> at least a modicum of trust in one of his own soldiers to explain
why
> it was imperative for Harry to spend a certain amount of time, even
> the majority of his time, living with his blood relatives. We know
> that DD can be somewhat manipulative - don't you think that Sirius'
> feelings of guilt over the deaths of James and Lily would have
given
> Dumbledore a gigantic keyboard of buttons to push to make sure
Sirius
> accepted his decision that Harry had to live with the Dursleys?
>
> Maybe I still have a naive, altruistic world-view, but I think
there
> are things that are simply wrong. Leaving a person in prison when
> you can prove their innocence is wrong. If presenting the evidence
> for their innocence and release causes complications in your plans,
> tough darts. Find another way.
>
I don't think you're any more naive and altruistic than JKR. The idea
of DD knowing Sirius to be innocent but leaving him in Azkaban for 12
year not only goes completely against DD's characterization, it is
also illogical. If DD knows Sirius to be innocent, why is he so
worried for Harry's and the rest of the students' safety when Sirius
escapes? And if he is so uncaring of Sirius' fate, why risk *Harry's*
life (for whom he supposedly sacrificed Sirius) by sending him to
rescue Sirius via the timeturner? The whole thing just doesn't make
sense - it makes DD's behavior too full of inconsistencies.
Naama
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive