THEORY: Hogwarts curriculum
frugalarugala
frugalarugala at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 5 19:06:24 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 112140
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Nora Renka" <nrenka at y...>
wrote:
> Maybe there is a wide and flourishing tradition of wizarding
> literature--there are certainly books, of course. There is no
> evidence of the classroom presence of reading literature in order
to
> read literature, though; reading through a book as a class to
discuss
> meaning, interpretation, all of that jazz, this seems to just not
be
> there. And the kids and the entire WW are intellectually
> impoverished from it.
Historically, people read a lot more FOR ENTERTAINMENT than most
people do today, so maybe, lacking tv and radio, the wizarding world
thinks of it's literature more as a form of entertainment. The same
used to be true for music, with the number of people who could play
decreasing when recording technology came along.
I also suspect that if the wizarding world relies on muggle schools
(along with homeschooling) for early education, they probably also
rely on the muggle educational system for higher levels than
Hogwarts provides. I can picture them going into appreniceships to
study magic-related feilds in depth, but going on to a muggle
university to study something were the wizarding world and muggle
world overlap. Afterall, why create a seporate system of their own,
when the majority (the muggles) already have one in place? I see
Hogwarts as the school for what they can't get from the muggle
schools.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive