The Sneak Mark (was "Slytherin" Hermione?)
totorivers
tombadgerlock at freesurf.fr
Tue Sep 14 19:53:26 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 112978
> David:
> > On some of the wider arguments presented in this thread, I
> feel that whether, as a technical legal matter Hermione had the
> right to 'punish' Marietta is somewhat beside the point. <
>
> Pippin:
> To me, it's exactly the point. Hermione is very sensitive about
> lack of due process, lack of informed consent, cruel and
> unusual punishments, unrepresentative government and being
> nasty to toerags in general, but it's a case of being able to see
> the speck in your neighbor's eye better than the two by four in
> your own.
Toto: Once again, you assume something, that Hermione did that for
*punishment*. She didn't. When Malfoy bothers her, she does not
punish him, and so on... What Hermione did was a preventive measure:
If there is a betrayer, they would know who it is, and be able to
remove that person from the D.A. Hence, she couldn't warn them, as
it would have given them a chance to take off the hex.
Toto
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive