Snape and Harry again.

pippin_999 foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Sep 18 21:31:45 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 113321

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214" 
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:

> 
> I guess I did not make myself clear again. The situation which 
would  mitigate James guit (Not absolve , but mitigate) for me 
would be  when he or his family suffered direct hurt from Death 
Eaters and  based on that James hated Dark Arts and anybody 
who likes them<

Not that there's the slightest indication in canon of that...but even 
if there was...

It's a good thing for Remus that James's family wasn't injured by 
Death Eater werewolves, I suppose, and a good thing for Hagrid 
it wasn't Death Eater giants. And a good thing for Hermione that 
she wasn't around back then, since she disagrees with a 
Ministry approved textbook about which spells ought to be 
considered dark, and has been known to raid the restricted 
section herself.  

 Does the fact that Gryffindors treated him  badly when he was in 
school make you think better of Snape for treating Gryffindors 
badly now?

Pippin





More information about the HPforGrownups archive