Snape and Harry again.
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Sep 18 21:31:45 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 113321
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214"
<dumbledore11214 at y...> wrote:
>
> I guess I did not make myself clear again. The situation which
would mitigate James guit (Not absolve , but mitigate) for me
would be when he or his family suffered direct hurt from Death
Eaters and based on that James hated Dark Arts and anybody
who likes them<
Not that there's the slightest indication in canon of that...but even
if there was...
It's a good thing for Remus that James's family wasn't injured by
Death Eater werewolves, I suppose, and a good thing for Hagrid
it wasn't Death Eater giants. And a good thing for Hermione that
she wasn't around back then, since she disagrees with a
Ministry approved textbook about which spells ought to be
considered dark, and has been known to raid the restricted
section herself.
Does the fact that Gryffindors treated him badly when he was in
school make you think better of Snape for treating Gryffindors
badly now?
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive