Lily, LV and Harry at GH.
Hannah
hannahmarder at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Sep 21 10:53:05 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 113514
<snip of my (Hannah's) theory that Lily AK'ed Harry in order to save
him a worse fate at the hands of LV>
>
> khinterberg replied:
> This theory actually sounds rather believable, except for a bit of
> canon I came across:
>
> "Harry had escaped from the same attack with nothing more than a
> scar on his forehead, where Voldemort's curse, instead of killing
> him, had rebounded upon its originator." - PoA p 6 U.S. pb
>
> I can't read this passage any way other than that Voldemort cast
the curse that rebounded (be it AK or something else ).
Hannah: Yes, that's a good point, however, IMO it is just filling in
narrative, giving the accepted view of what happened. I suppose it
depends on the individual interpretation - but the narrative only
gives information from Harry's point of view at that time (with the
exception of the first chapter of PS/SS). It would be like
referring to Scabbers always as 'the evil animagus disguised as a
rat' - it would be correct, but not coherent with Harry's pov (and a
bit of a plot spoiler).
The narrative tells us what is happening, what Harry thinks and
feels, and gives a resume of events as Harry thinks they occurred.
The narrative in PS/SS states that Lily and James died in a car
crash. This isn't true, but it is what Harry considers to be the
truth at that time.
This is just my opinion. I can perfectly understand your point.
Hannah
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive