Lily, LV and Harry at GH.

Hannah hannahmarder at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Sep 21 10:53:05 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 113514

<snip of my (Hannah's) theory that Lily AK'ed Harry in order to save 
him a worse fate at the hands of LV>
> 
> khinterberg replied:
> This theory actually sounds rather believable, except for a bit of 
> canon I came across:
> 
> "Harry had escaped from the same attack with nothing more than a 
> scar on his forehead, where Voldemort's curse, instead of killing 
> him, had rebounded upon its originator." - PoA p 6 U.S. pb
> 
> I can't read this passage any way other than that Voldemort cast 
the curse that rebounded (be it AK or something else ).

Hannah: Yes, that's a good point, however, IMO it is just filling in 
narrative, giving the accepted view of what happened.  I suppose it 
depends on the individual interpretation - but the narrative only 
gives information from Harry's point of view at that time (with the 
exception of the first chapter of PS/SS).  It would be like 
referring to Scabbers always as 'the evil animagus disguised as a 
rat' - it would be correct, but not coherent with Harry's pov (and a 
bit of a plot spoiler).  

The narrative tells us what is happening, what Harry thinks and 
feels, and gives a resume of events as Harry thinks they occurred.  
The narrative in PS/SS states that Lily and James died in a car 
crash.  This isn't true, but it is what Harry considers to be the 
truth at that time.  

This is just my opinion.  I can perfectly understand your point.
Hannah





More information about the HPforGrownups archive