Was Crouch Junior a DE? (was Re: ESE!Fudge)
Hannah
hannahmarder at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Sep 22 19:05:50 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 113606
> Bookworm wrote:
> Since reading GoF, I've thought that the Karkaroff/Snape/Crouch
> triumvirate was too easy to assume. At the time, I argued Bagman
> was the cowardly one (because of the way he was running from his
> debts to the goblins), but reading this thread makes me think he
> might have been the faithful DE and his cowardice is a cover.
>
> Canon against Crouch Junior being the third missing DE:
> If Junior was the `most faithful servant' would he have
> shrieked during his trial: "I didn't, I swear it Father,
> don't send me back to the dementors - " and "Mother, stop
> him, Mother, I didn't do it, it wasn't me!" [GoF, Ch30]
>
> This doesn't sound very faithful. Bellatrix was standing right
> next to him, so it is probable she reported it to Voldemort.
Fudge, OTOH, was very quick to have him `kissed' so that he
> couldn't tell anything more. Was it so he couldn't name
> Fudge? Or so that no one would realize that he [Junior] *wasn't*
> guilty of earlier crimes?
<snip>
> The Lestranges were `faithful' and didn't renounce
> Voldemort. It doesn't make sense that Junior would also be
> described as `the faithful servant' even though he calls
> himself that. [GoF, Ch35]
>
Hannah now: But he didn't renounce LV. He only said he didn't do it
(torture the Longbottoms). OK, that's a subtle difference, but
maybe he genuinely believed he could better serve LV by not getting
thrown in Azkaban. It would also explain why he 're-enters' LV's
service. Also, his confession at the end of GoF is made under
Veritaserum, under which he cannot lie. Therefore he must have done
the things that he's claiming.
> Hannah originally:
> 'It was through his efforts that our young friend arrived here
> tonight.' What actions led to Harry being at the graveyard? First,
> putting his name in the goblet (Crouch Jr.)
>
> Bookworm continued:
> Before Harry's name could go into the goblet, there had to be a
> tournament.
<snip of quotes>
> Who was Bertha's boss who refused to search when she went
> missing? Bagman.
> <snip>
> the Tournament was being planned before Bertha ran into
Voldemort.
Hannah now: An event of that size was probably planned for at least
a year beforehand (I would imagine). I don't think the whole
tournament was brought back to get at Harry. LV found out about it
and it and *he* decided to use the event to deliver Potter to him.
The lack of a search for Bertha is a bit worrying, but I don't think
that it means Bagman was acting out of loyalty to LV at that point.
I agree that it is quite possible that Bagman may turn out to have
been/ still be a DE. I suppose he may even have been acting in
league with Crouch Jr. But I really don't think that he can get the
credit for orchestrating everything and for being the loyalist DE.
Though you make a good case for it :-)
Hannah
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive