Snape and Harry again.
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Sep 23 16:43:15 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 113665
>
> Alla:
>
> I was not even saying that Snape is up to no good, although
who
> knows. :)
>
> I was only arguing that he , IMO, should not be REWARDED in
any way for MOM disaster, because he did not do what he was
supposed to do from the very beginning of the events and
therefore does not deserve the credit of "saving Harry's life",
that's all.
>
> I can give him some credit for his other actions, but really,
Snape's saving Harry's life in MOM?<
>
Harry was able to save himself from possession, but our guys
weren't winning when the Order arrived. Harry was just about to
hand over the prophecy to keep Neville from being tortured. If he
had, it wouldn't have taken Voldemort long to learn that there was
nothing in it to keep him from having another go at killing Harry.
All Voldie would have had to do is borrow Bella's wand, and he
could have AK'd Harry. By sending the Order to Harry's aid,
Snape prevented that.
It's open to debate whether occlumency would have shut
Voldemort out of Harry's mind even if he had mastered it. As
Snape said at the beginning of the lessons,"the usual rules do
not seem to apply with you, Potter." If the ancient spells and
charms on the walls and grounds of Hogwarts that were
supposed to keep Voldemort from influencing those who dwell
within didn't work, there's no guarantee occlumency would have.
Pippin
noting suspiciously that Lupin didn't actually teach Harry how to
do the corporeal patronus, and that Harry's indistinct patronus
wasn't much help, even against only one dementor in OOP
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive