Priori Incantatem, was: surviving AK
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Sun Sep 26 06:44:26 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 113906
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Alex Boyd" <alex51324 at h...>
wrote:
>
> > Bookworm:
> > To paraphrase someone (Mr. Spock?): when all the impossible
options
> > have been eliminated, the one of the remaining options, no matter
> > how improbable, is the answer.
>
> I believe it was Holmes, actually, though Spock may have said it
too.
Geoff:
I immediately thought of Holmes -
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the
impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"
(Sign of the Four)
Alex:
> BTW, speaking of PI, there was a thread a week or so ago about why
> Priori Incantatem wasn't used to clear Sirius of the Pettigrew
murder.
> (I don't *think* it was ever resolved, but please forgive me if I'm
> repeating what someone else has already said.) The answer is that
it
> wouldn't have been possible. Priori Incantatem isn't a spell.
We're
> told in GoF (US hardback p. 697, the chapter "The parting of the
> ways), that Priori Incantatem is a "Very rare effect" that happens
> when two "brother" wands are forced to do battle. It is,
apparently,
> totally involuntary, and since it only works between "brother"
wands,
Geoff:
I don't read it this way. In GOF "The Parting of the Ways",
Dumbledore mentions Priori Incantatem which Sirius recognises as a
reverse spell. It has been pointed out that a form of this (Prior
Incantato) was used by Amos Diggory but I interpret the graveyard
result as being an unusual side effect of this spell when brother
wands meet but that the the spell is also known for its wider use. If
only the former occurred, how would it be known - the probability of
brother wands meeting like that must be pretty long?
Geoff
Enjoy Exmoor and the
heritage West Somerset Railway at:
http://www.aspectsofexmoor.com
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive