Harry's dead (short lifeline)

[orqad7]

No: HPFGUIDX 126913


> Caesian wrote in #123612:
> In that scenario, when Voldemort dies, so does Harry.  

J.K has given a really big clue which, in a way relates directly 
to this theory. She said in one of her interviews that a question 
which she has not been asked which she feels she should have been, 
is not why Harry lived, but why Voldemort did not die.

I think she is quite decided that Harry lived, but why didn't LV 
die? So far I have one thoery of my own and a really good one that 
someone else wrote an essay on. My theory is that Voldemort did 
not die BECAUSE Harry lived. (All arguments for and against will 
be greatly recieved.) Something to do with LV transferring some of 
himself onto Harry. So a part of him still existed in Harry, 
therefore he could not die.

The second theory which I wish was my own is along the lines of 
the measures LV has taken to ensure he did not die. The general 
idea is that he has to kill all blood relatives to become immortal. 
(to read the column which I think everyone should, visit www.hplexicon.com) I really have gone off on a tangent, but I can't 
help myself!!

One last bit, In OotP when Hagrid returns, he is covered in cuts 
and bruises, and uses dragon meat to help the healing process. Is 
this one of the 12 uses for dragons blood? Is it one of the steps 
to immortality? 

Don't know if any of this made sense, but have been waiting for 
ages to write everything down.

orqad7