Prophecy wording prophecy wording - why repeat it it?

[tinglinger]

No: HPFGUIDX 128022


tinglinger
there is nothing more annoying than having someone
make their own silly interpretation of another's
canon. Disagree, even tear apart, but don't put words 
in someone else's mouth
for example-

hambtty at t
There are two - THE ONE BORN as the seventh month
dies and THE ONE WILL BE BORN when the seventh
month dies.

greatelderone
That means absolutely nothing. It's just common
repetition that we see in all of Trelawney's
prophecies. 
<snip>
By your reasoning perhaps there was another servant
that set out that day in PoA to rejoin Voldemort.

tinglinger again -
well how about THIS interpretation, geo?
the POA prophecy was said twice because the event
it predicted was true and happened twice - meaning 
that it could not be changed by the time turner....
otherwise it MIGHT have been possible that the
prophecy ORIGINALLY was true the first time it
occurred but was altered by H&H going back in time.
Whether you agree with the repetition or not is is 
still more feasible than your response.......
As far as the second repetition, you have not
discredited the possibility that Neville will have 
a major role in defeating Voldemort.

greatelderone 
And interesting enough, you seem rather intent in
ignoring the overwhelming amount of evidence that
shows Harry not Neville is the One. Is it so
important that he has to be a prophecy child in
order to play a part in the story when he already
has enough reasons to be against Voldemort?

tinglinger
kindly respond to this post with your "overwhelming"
canon evidence that BOTH Harry and Neville can't be
the ONE. I am very curious indeed.
and as for your question and without providing
evidence to the contrary, why is it so important to
you that Neville NOT be the prophecy child?


tinglinger 
whose yahoogroup potterplots presents these types
of theories with canon support - predictions may
not happen but they cannot be dismissed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/potterplots