Missing Horcrux = Ravenclaw's
Dysis
d.marchel at comcast.net
Tue Aug 9 11:39:59 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 137036
jujube wrote:
<snip>
> 7. The "missing item" from the Tarot card is the wand.
>
> 8. There is an old wand given a place of honor in Ollivander's
shop.
>
> 9. Ollivander is missing and the shop is empty.
>
> 10. Wands are powerful magical objects.
</snip>
I was reading the interview with JK and the Leaky Cauldron and
Mugglenet founders yesterday
(http://www.mugglenet.com/jkrinterview.shtml). It struck me that JK
said, "Well, I'm prepared to bet you now, that at least before the
week is out, at least one of the Horcruxes will have been correctly
identified by careful re-readers of the books."
I thought about it basically all night. ^_^;; I kept asking
myself, what objects did LV have before he killed Harry's parents?
One thing that kept jumping into my mind was his wand. The more I
thought about it, the more intrigued I was. His body was destroyed
the night he killed the Potters. (The house was also destroyed for
some odd reason that we still don't know about, but that's for
another post ~_^) So his wand must've been lost somewhere in the
rubble of the Potter's home. Yet, by the end of book 4, LV has his
wand back. Who got it for him? And why? You would think LV was
powerful enough to use any wand, why have one of his followers risk
their lives and to get that wand? Perhaps because the wand was a
horcrux.
I think there's also a possibility that LV's wand might be somehow
tied to the founders, in this case probably even Ravenclaw. I would
bet that Fawkes was alive during the founding of Hogwarts, and he
could've given his two feathers back then. Or, maybe he gave one
feather back then (for Ravenclaw's/Voldy's wand) and then given a
second feather much later, perhaps after LV's first defeat (for
Harry's wand).
Interesting about Ollivander's disappearance! I interpreted it as JK
giving us clues as to what one of the Horcruxes might be.
~Dysisgirl
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive