Would DD try to make Harry capable of Unforgivables? (was: Portrait!DD)

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 137917

>  
> houyhnhnm:
> 
> I agree and I don't see any support in the book for the kind of
> legalistic morality exemplified by those who think an AK tears your
> soul but blasting an old man off a tower with a stunning spell so
that
> he falls to his death is okay. 
This is the way hardliners at the
> Ministry of Magic think, but neither Harry nor Dumbledore exhibits
> this type of legalistic thinking.  Both are willing to break any
> number of rules and even laws in the interest of a higher good.


Alla:

Could you please show me some canon support for idea that Ministry 
called " Unforgivables" as such. The way I see it it is some kind of 
common tradition, which existed in WW from who knows how long time 
ago (just speculating of course, but not remembering anything 
definite in the books to the contrary)

I see not performing " Unforgivables" as supporting some kind of
moral 
law, spiritual law. 

As to not supporting  the idea  that AK tears your soul, I see all
HBP 
as supporting it, because I see horcruxes story as metaphor for " 
murder is bad for your soul".
And NO, blasting DD of the tower with ANY kind of spell is definitely 
NOT OK in my book, so not OK.


JMO,
Alla.