Relative importance of Snape vs D'dore (was :Hermione saves Snape?)
ushit_k
ushit_k at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 23 16:26:01 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 138562
[Lots of snipping]
> > Ushit_K:
> > Even an old and waning Dumbledore is a powerful asset.
colebiancardi:
[snip]
> No one is disputing that. However, Dumbledore wasn't going to
> live forever. <snip> I do think the Snape's asset of being
> a spy is much more important at this time - he is the only one
> in the Order that can get *close* to Voldemort (or as close as
> LV will let anyone). The battle is coming to a climax and all
> the insights that Snape can gather and any havoc he can create
> in the DEs' lair will be extremely important.
Given that at present Snape has been seen to murder Dumbledore, I
think that the members of the order would not be inclined to trust
him. Losing Dumbledore to gain insights into the DEs is quite a
high price. Dumbledore has after all managed to find out quite a
bit about Voldemort without Snape. Of course the nub of the matter
is, the evilness (or not) of Snape and if Dumbledore's death was
part of his grand plan.
"Ushit_K"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive