why I'm loathe to believe that Snape is evil, evil, evil
Hagrid
aussie_lol at yahoo.com.au
Fri Aug 26 15:16:51 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 138794
--- Schlobin wrote: (snipped)
> I resist believing this because it makes Professor Dumbledore out
> to be a fool. ...
>
> I guess I could accept that Professor Dumbledorewas wrong about
> Snape, but that his belief in change and transformation are still
> valid...but the whole idea that Snape had fooled Professor
> Dumbledore all these years plays into the idea that good people
> are "fools'..and that Albus Dumbledore himself -- the greatest
> wizard of his time -- was really gullible and foolish....
>
> I don't like it.....
aussie says:-
I take your point. I don't know if Snape is actually ESE (ever so
evil). I think more, he was biding his time with enough trust in
each camp to decide which was a better deal for himself.
Not just in a Pettigrew way, but with a bid for power play. If LV
dies and DE can continue, he would fancy himself as their next
leader. If things hadn't gone to Draco's advantage, he could have
remained the DADA teacher.
In Spinners End (HBP), he answered many questions. He showed he has
a tactical mind: "I had plenty of time to think about what I wanted
to do, to plan my next move, to escape like Karkaroff, didn't I?"
Was his original story to DD real? -He was sent to DD by LV to begin
with. He said as much at Spinners End and that is why LV trusts him
there.
Did he stay at Hogwarts (not completely trusted by DD, since he was
never offered the DADA role) out of loyalty to LV? -It was the
safest way to avoid Azkaban since DD was his only supportive witness.
Either way, Snape could have made sure he was ok, before helping
either DE or OOP.
-aussie-
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive