missing from the hogwarts curriculum ....
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 29 18:08:40 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 139018
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Geoff Bannister"
<gbannister10 at t...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Fabian Peng Kärrholm
> <fabian.peng-karrholm at c...> wrote:
>
> Fabian:
> > Hi!
> >
> > ... is the Latin language, as well as English. Just think about
it,
> the
> > entire Magic community, has not had more teachings in the
English
> > language than a 11 year old schoolkid.
> > If they at least learned latin, then Harry wouldn't have to
> wonder
> > what a spell like "levicorpus" does, and it could also be easier
to
> > invent new ones.
>
> Geoff:
> In one sense I agree with you. I took Latin to O level when I was
at
> grammar school and, despite the fact that I trained as a Maths
> teacher and later was involved in Computing, I have never
regretted
> learning the language. It is a marvellous tool for dealing with
> technical words which often use Latin or Greek roots and, once you
> have mastered Latin with six cases, German with four is a relative
> doddle.
>
> On the other hand, I would have thought that for Hogwarts
students, a
> Dictionary of Spells, listing them alphabetically with a
description
> of their use, rather as we have an ordinary dictionary, would be
> sufficient.
Yet, it does make me wonder why, say, Hermione would brave Ancient
Runes and neglect more obviously useful Latin. It's like heading to
the University without even completing secondary education.
a_svirn
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive