[HPforGrownups] Re: Hagrid and Snape's teaching method
sistermagpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Fri Dec 2 16:03:56 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 143902
> Betsy Hp:
So what Snape actually sees (if
> we go by the books, anyway) is a challenged student improving. If
> it's working, why should Snape change his methods?
Magpie:
I think what it mostly comes down to is that this is Snape. Teachers
are who they are in class, and for Snape when somebody isn't doing
what he wants, he does what he does to Neville. I suspect he does a
modified version for Crabbe and Goyle, though they don't have the
same problems Neville does in class. I think Snape does what he does
with Neville because it's his instinctual reaction. His instincts
are different with kids he likes or doesn't hate, but this is his
personality.
Does he see it working? I'd guess anything he doesn't see working he
chalks up to Neville being hopeless or still not listening--but I do
think he probably does on some level think that this will work. I
don't mean that he's got some plan or that he really wants Neville to
improve as a student, but more that he is locked into his own logic
about the situation. Snape's not exactly the type to always drop old
patterns when they're not helping him.:-) How many people in the
world usually gears when their natural first approach doesn't work?
If Snape has decided Neville is hopeless he's not going to blame
himself for Neville being a star student, and he'll probably take
credit for Neville's success.
Also, I do tend to agree with Pippin that, for instance, Snape's
being Neville's boggart isn't about Snape so much as Neville.
Hermione's boggart is a teacher too, saying she's failed everything.
Now, I'm not saying they're the same or that Snape himself has
nothing to do with why he's Neville's boggart, he does. But I think
Snape represents many adults who consider Neville a failure and
useless, and the part of himself that believes it and can't get away
from it. It's funny in HBP that a lot of people think McGonnagall is
great for saying that Neville's grandmother should start appreciating
the grandson she has instead of the one she wishes she has--but dude,
that's a humiliating thing for a teacher to say, isn't it? I suspect
that's a lot more painful for Neville than Snape--Snape just takes
all those unsaid things and says them out loud. No wonder Neville's
so upset by him.
There's times where I think the books go really overboard on the idea
that Neville just needs "confidence" and will improve, but I do think
that Neville has had less fear of Snape as he's gotten older,
particularly after he's had some success under his belt and faced
some of his fears. Actually, I suspect Rowling sees that as very
important for all kids. Dumbledore seems to stress that with Draco
at the end of HBP too, and it seemed like a good thing to do--Harry
doesn't know why he's responding to Draco's nefarious plans as if
they were an "ambitious homework assignment," but that's what it is.
A boy, whether they are Draco or Neville, who has inner confidence
because he sees himself do something on his own, is stronger and
stronger is better.
Not to draw too much of a parallel between Neville and Draco there,
but they both suffered under their family histories in different
ways. Just as Neville needs to stop seeing himself as not his
father, Draco improves when he's testing himself instead of being his
name. ("Malfoy would have to rely on his talent if he wanted to do
well in Advanced Potions"--was good for Malfoy.)
I think the important classes for Neville are often the ones where
he's singled out somehow. He does well with Lupin not just because
Lupin is a good teacher who's good with Neville, but because he
stands there and makes Neville do it. It's always seemed to me that
Neville's way of dealing with constantly being told he's useless is
to say he's useless, sort of passively giving up to avoid the
hassle. It makes sense, but he can't do it with Snape. If Neville
says he can't do it, Snape makes him do it anyway. I'm not
congratulating Snape for this like he's got good intentions--Sprout
is no doubt better by not letting Neville give up because he's
*talented*--but I wouldn't be surprised if Rowling ultimately saw the
lesson of Neville/Snape being about Neville getting through it rather
than Neville's childhood hurts being soothed.
Sherry:
When the kids got caught after handing over Norbert, and
they got detention and lost so many house points, why didn't Hagrid
confess
that he'd had an illegal dragon and that the kids were trying to help
him by
getting rid of it? i've always felt that whole thing was his fault,
and as
the adult, he should have come forward and said something. yes, the
kids
would still have been out of bounds and lost points and gotten
detention,
but perhaps it wouldn't have been as bad.
Magpie:
Yes! But that's central to Hagrid's personality. Here he is in a
situation where he's acting completely inappropriately, not taking
responsibility as an adult when he should have, dragging the kid into
something illegal he's doing, expecting them to lie for him, and
never seeming to consider this wrong. Iirc, all he continually cares
about is the dragon he wants--and he's looking longingly at the
dragon eggs in GoF as well. As Betsy mentioned, his response to Ron
being bitten by Norbert is to yell at Ron for scaring the dragon.
Ron spends the next day not getting medical care for his bite because
he's worried Pomfrey will recognize the bite and Hagrid will get in
trouble--this while his hand is swelling to twice its normal size.
They know this is the guy teaching the CoMC class.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive