Please explain. . ./Canon for the Snape being abusive argument
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 6 22:05:29 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 144230
> > Betsy Hp:
> > Unfortunately, the circular argument is all the "Snape is a child
> > abuser" supporters seem to have. Very little, if any, canon is
> ever
> > brought forth in these arguments. And what canon *is* brought
> forth
> > is taken far outside the WW standards of behavior.
>
>
Alla:
>
I am sorry, Betsy, but your claim here is simply not true. Canon to
support "Snape is an abuser" argument was brought up many, many, many
times.
It is your absolute right of course to NOT see abuse in these
incidents, but some people do and of course I happen to think that it
is a very reasonable interpretation.
Here are some posts for you. I selected those with quotes. If you
would like more quotes, just let me know and I will be happy to
provide them.
Erm, sorry to start with my post.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/112968
Post by Vmonte:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/122173
Post by John Kern:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/131481.
Alla.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive