Voldemort's Plan in Book 7
ornadv
ornawn at 013.net
Thu Dec 15 22:43:05 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 144815
>Jen:
>Maybe a crack in his Occlumency came during the interrogation when
>he returned after the graveyard? Or maybe when Dumbledore was near
>death and Snape saved him from the ring curse, did a flicker of
>feeling break through and was accessed by Voldemort? Nothing big or
>flashy, just some slight moment that gave away Snape's feelings for
>Dumbledore or his allegiance.
Orna:
I think it's possible. But even if not, my understanding of
Voldemort is, that it wouldn't matter in his toying around with him.
I mean, if he thought Snape was DDM! he would kill him of course,
but even if Snape proves from his POV to be continuously loyal to
him I think he would reward him on the short term, and coerce him
into impossible situations on the long term. Voldemort can't afford
to have a feeling like trust evolve in himself. If he were to accept
anybody's loyalty for a long period this feeling would be bound to
arise. He wouldn't be able to feel "weakened" by a trust which stems
from gut-feelings, and not by control with legilimancy and
manipulations. (Not to mention "complications like dealing with
disappointments as we see with Lucius, Bellatrix). I imagine him
continuously inventing missions for his servants, which place them
in conflicted situations like sacrificing Draco, and Narcissa
knowing about the task he could have left it a secret between
himself and Draco. Like placing Wormtail (a marauder) in Snape's
place surely a torture for both of them. As long as he does those
power-manipulations, (rewarding punishing, and enticing his servants
to more tasks) he knows that he is powerful, and not some weakling
trusting or believing in friendship, perhaps even beginning to long
for them. It's interesting that his connectedness with his "true
family" is that the second he presses the dark mark - they have to
come. Again this paradoxical thing, where instead of longing,
wanting, being happy that someone arrives, we have obedience, and
checking on the speed of it.
Therefore I think, it's part of his necessity to put his servants
in emotionally impossible places where they "prove" there loyalty
by doing something which hurts them, and their human feelings.
Narcissa has two choices to be loyal to Voldemort, and sacrifice
her son or to endanger herself by trying to save or protect her son
(BTW again the motive of "testing" in act mother's love against self-
preservation).
Snape, even if he is ESE!Snape (not IMO), looses all his ability to
live in the WW after killing DD. He will be hunted, cursed, looses
his teacher's place. He looses in Voldemort eyes, whatever social
connectedness he had by this, and has now only the DE to rely on as
social supporters. Since Snape, as we know, is a very lonely
person, it is a most accurate hit in his weak spot. Compare it to
the Malfoys- who were able to live in the WW quite comfortably
having their own family, and quite an active social life ministry
included.
What I'm trying to say, is that there doesn't have to be any precise
suspicion on Voldemort's part, in order for him to arrange a plan,
which uses the person's weakness against himself it is part of
his "relation" to his followers.
But perhaps you are right in some breach in occlumency helping
Voldemort to channel the plan right into the "soft spot" if he
thought some human connectedness was between Snape and DD he would
look for a plan, which forces Snape to betray this emotion. A little
bit like room 101 in Orwell's 1984 somehow forcing the person to
betray the person, whom he loves, cares for. That's also what Harry
would have felt had he not run to the MoM in OotP if he had just
assumed it to be impossible, and waited more, something inside him
might have felt, he had been willing to let Sirius die. So it's
again a twofold bad situation.
>Jen:
>I hesitate to say LV is no longer a threat to Harry, but I do think
>he has given Harry all the weapons needed to defeat him, and Harry's
>blocks to overcome are within himself. He doesn't fully understand
>his power or believe in it, and now there's the side-show with Snape
>that draws the focus from Voldemort. Although Harry's laser focus on
>the horcrux in his pocket is foreshadowing, I think. He's really not
>going to be diverted by Snape unless Snape gets in his way...and,
>erm....we can guess what that means!
Orna:
I think that's the crucial thing we have to see. If Harry gets
distracted by his hatred towards Snape from his main task
Voldemort is winning. If he meets Snape, and both of them are able
to find a way out of this entanglement, Voldemort would cease to
be a threat for Harry. We think a lot about what Harry is going to
do. But I don't believe Voldemort will send Snape on a two-month
vacation. I rather think he will escalate Snape's situation, and
have him somehow get mixed with Harry perhaps also having Draco
there in a way don't know how, but something there. Perhaps having
Snape put in a place, where guarding Draco endangers Harry, and vice
versa.
I'm not very clear in this post, I'm just trying to play around with
ideas, hoping to understand more of Voldemort.
>Jen: Heh, I like your devious mind. ;) Likely we won't hear much
>about it now that the Dumbledore/Snape link is broken. Maybe in
>retrospect?
Orna:
My dark mark is showing <g>
Orna
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive