Dumbledore Wrong? - The Sword.

[susanbones2003]

No: HPFGUIDX 145222

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <bboyminn at y...> wrote:
>
> SNIPPED HEAVILY:

> So, my central point is that I don't think that a Horcrux itself is
> inherently dangerous. It isn't automatically a cursed object. One
> could handle and wear the object without fear. Again, that is a 
normal
> Horcrux. Harry handled and destroyed the Diary easily, but that 
object
> didn't have additional protections. It was meant to be found and 
used.
> The Ring and the Locket were never meant to be found and/or used, 
so
> their additional protections would have been much stronger.
> 
> For what it's worth.
> 
> Steve/bboyminn

You gave us two categories: an object that was meant to be used and 
then objects that were never meant to be used or found and therefore 
this type has additional protections. Which category would this put 
the sword in, if indeed it's a horcrux? It's confusing because I 
find it very difficult to think of Harry offing the basilisk with a 
weapon that contains part of LV's soul. Are there any other possible 
Gryffindor objects? 
Jen D
>