Heroes and Not - What should Snape Have Done?.

[eggplant107]

No: HPFGUIDX 145321

 Amanda Shoffner <babyhrndz at y...> wrote:

> If all of this is true, then why the 
> argument with SS & DD where SS tells
> DD he wants out? 

OK I admit it, when I said my theory explained all of Snape's actions
I was overstating my case just a tad. My theory can explain almost
everything about Snape, almost but not quite. If truth be told I don't
have a clue what that argument with Dumbledore in the forest was all
about, but I will say this; Dumbledore was a man who didn't lose his
temper easily, the fact that he nevertheless lost it with Snape does
not make the good Snape theory stronger. 

> DD knows EVERY detail that goes on at Hogwarts 

That's not true, Dumbledore knew nothing about the Marauder's
activity.  Much more seriously Dumbledore was very surprised that
Death Eaters had gotten into the castle, even though Harry had warned
him that something like that might happen when they were away finding
the (fake) Horcrux; Harry even pinpointed where the danger was, the
Room Of Requirement, and who was behind it, Draco. So Harry told
Dumbledore when the danger would happen, where it would come from and
who was behind it; but when it did happen just as Harry said it would
Dumbledore was surprised. Dumbledore is not immune from making
blunders, like trusting Severus Snape.

Eggplant