TBAY: Definitely NOT a Snape Theory (long)
nkafkafi
nkafkafi at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 24 16:38:28 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 145336
> Pippin:
> It follows directly from Dumbledore's explanation in PS/SS.
> "Well, they did rather detest each other. Not unlike yourself and
> Mr. Malfoy. And then, your father did something Snape could never
forgive."
> "What?"
> "He saved his life."
> "*What*?"
> "Yes..." said Dumbledore dreamily. "Funny, the way some people's
minds
> work, isn't it? Professor Snape couldn't bear being in your
father's debt..."
>
>
> Snape hated James, but he hated being under obligations to James
even
> more. Then he put himself further in debt to James by endangering
James's life.
> Naturally Snape would regret that deeply. But it didn't stop him
from hating
> James...why should it?
>
> Then James died, and Harry inherited both the debt and the hatred.
Snape has
> an obligation to Harry and, according to Dumbledore, wants very
much to
> be quit of it. But nothing in the obligation requires Snape to be
considerate of
> Harry or like Harry or feel sorry for Harry. So he isn't and he
doesn't.
>
> Think of all the people who hate their landlords or their mortgage
holders,
> think the whole property-owning class is rotten and their children
are
> spoiled brats who will grow up to be just the same, but are far
too proud
> to even dream of defaulting on their payments, much less murder.
>
Neri:
Pippin, you are precisely illustrating the point I was making. The
canon you quoted is the basic assumption of LID, not of DDM. There's
nothing in Dumbledore's words here about Snape's remorse or about him
changing sides or being Dumbledore's man, which are the necessary
assumptions for DDM. So I repeat the point Snape's hatred for Harry
does *not* follow directly from the basic assumption of DDM, and it
*does* follow from the basic assumption of LID.
BTW, Faith would be quick to point out here that LID is the only
Snape theory that its basic assumption isn't an assumption at all
it's canon (the very canon you quoted above). This is why she claims
that LID isn't even a theory.
Neri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive