Heroes and Not - What should Snape Have Done?.

[eggplant107]

No: HPFGUIDX 145410

>Me:
>With the significant exception of 
>Snape none of the other Death Eaters
>in the tower that night were a match
>for Harry, not even the mighty werewolf,
>Harry disposed of them one after another.

festuco" <vuurdame at x...> wrote:

> Nope.

Yep.

>Greyback was doing fine before
>someone else petrfied him.

For a second or two you shook my confidence, I was wondering if I was
crazy and you could be right, but I've just reread that part of the
book. And I was right. Unless my eyes are deceiving me Harry is the
one who petrified Greybeck not "someone else". No mater how you spin
it Greybeck was not "doing fine".

> Harry was also not doing well 
> against the DE who used Crucio on hin.

That happened after Harry had already fought and defeated 5 or 6 Death
Eaters, and it was a 2 on one attack, and it was a surprise attack
from the rear. Do you really think any of them, apart from Snape,
would have stood a chance against Harry in a one on one frontal
attack? I don't.

Eggplant