Magic and genetics (wasRe: The Mauraders' Generation)
Hannah
hannahmarder at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Feb 1 14:11:51 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123628
> Nicky Joe wonders:
> I would really like to have some explanation from JKR about the
> genetics behind all this - some Muggles can have witch/wizard kids
> and some witch/wizards can have squib kids. Where is the logic?
>
> Arynn explained:
<snip>
> Maybe wizards have a similar getetic coding. W/m (wizard/muggle)
and m/m (muggle squared), so even if most of the family is W/m a m/m
could come along. Since we know squibs are WAY rarer than
muggleborns, obviously the wizard gene is dominant. So alot of
muggles must have latent Wizard genes.
Hannah: Nice explanation of genetics Arynn! JKR said that the
magic gene is a very strong dominant gene - which works fine for the
squibs side of it, as explained above. Unfortunately, it doesn't
account for the Muggle-born wizards and witches. If a gene is
dominant, then the parent carrying it would have to have magical
ability as well.
So I guess we have to assume that the Muggle-born wizards/witches
are the result of a new mutation in the 'magic' gene. As most half-
bloods are magical, it wouldn't make sense for the gene to be
recessive. Of course, there's also the possibility of multiple
genes being involved, or of imprinting... or just that
it's 'magic.' I find the genetics of magic one of things in HP that
it's better not to think about too much!
Hannah
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive