Choice of James as Head Boy (was Re: James, a paragon of virtue?)

mommystery2003 mommystery at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 2 01:05:50 UTC 2005


No: HPFGUIDX 123680


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "ladyramkin2001" 
<sylviablundell at a...> wrote:
Dumbledore may have considered James had a potential for leadership 
that qualified him for the position.  As to Snape, I think he was 
probably academically more brilliant than either James or Sirius, but 
lacked the qualities necessary for leadership. 

James may have had a potential for leadership, but we'll never know.  
I think it more likely Dumbledore chose him because he favors 
Gryffindors.  But why not Remus?  He was already a Prefect.  He must 
have been hurt to be chosen over someone who wasn't even a Prefect.

As for Snape being more brilliant than James or Sirius, I concur 
100%.  Those two were more concerned about taunting Severus and 
breaking the rules.  Remus does tell Harry his father had a habit of 
finding trouble.  I'm sure Severus isn't the only one those two 
harassed either.  They were bullies.  That alone should have 
precluded James from being Head Boy.







More information about the HPforGrownups archive