Choice of James as Head Boy (was Re: James, a paragon of virtue?)
mommystery2003
mommystery at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 2 01:05:50 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 123680
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "ladyramkin2001"
<sylviablundell at a...> wrote:
Dumbledore may have considered James had a potential for leadership
that qualified him for the position. As to Snape, I think he was
probably academically more brilliant than either James or Sirius, but
lacked the qualities necessary for leadership.
James may have had a potential for leadership, but we'll never know.
I think it more likely Dumbledore chose him because he favors
Gryffindors. But why not Remus? He was already a Prefect. He must
have been hurt to be chosen over someone who wasn't even a Prefect.
As for Snape being more brilliant than James or Sirius, I concur
100%. Those two were more concerned about taunting Severus and
breaking the rules. Remus does tell Harry his father had a habit of
finding trouble. I'm sure Severus isn't the only one those two
harassed either. They were bullies. That alone should have
precluded James from being Head Boy.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive