Dumbledore the Counselor (was: Dumbledore the General)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Feb 12 17:23:00 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124424
> > Pippin:
> > Then it would also have been morally wrong to leave Harry in
the WW, where he would have been abused by fame and
fortune. If you don't think so, consider the fate of so many child
movie stars of the thirties and forties, compared to the way
famous children are sheltered today. There's a reason that
Chelsea Clinton and the English princes weren't in the news
much when they were minors.<<
Phoenixgod2000:
> Pippin, if Harry can survive his childhood with a strong moral
background, then he could have survived fame and fortune with
strong morals as well. <
Pippin:
It seems a bit, well, arbitrary to me to state that Harry's great
inner strength would have seen him through fame and fortune
better than it would have seen him through the Dursleys. How on
earth could Dumbledore, or any of us, know that?
Then there's the admittedly vexed question of whether Harry only
developed that inner strength because he knew he needed it to
survive. Harry was exposed to Muggle culture which carries that
message very strongly, but would he have learned that in the
wizarding world? Or would he have thought that inner strength
comes from having good bloodlines and doesn't require any
effort on his part?
Phoenixgod2000:
I agree that there would have been a lot of pressure on him but I
am sure that any parents that were selected by Harry would have
shown some judgement, taught him restraint and kept a lid
on his spending. That's what good parents do, even the parents
of child stars.
. Do you really think that Harry would have grown up
> spoiled if he had been raised by a good pureblooded family
like the Weasleys or the Boneses? I doubt it.<
Pippin:
Our culture knows that's what good parents should do. But that's
a modern development, built on the tragedies of the past.
Consider the Dionne quintuplets. Those children were so
adored by the public that they became a freak show. No one
realized the harm it would do, except for a few prescient people
who weren't listened to. That's the position Dumbledore would
have been in.
Phoenixgod200:
> I personally think that the best thing DD could have done would
have been to fake Harry's death and hide him somewhere else,
like France or America, as just another war orphan. <
Pippin:
And deprive Harry's survival of its meaning for the WW? "Harry
Potter shone like a beacon of hope for those who thought the
dark days would never end," -- Dobby CoS, ch 10. There might
not have been a wizarding world for Harry to come back to, in that
case.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive