The Dark Mark
snow15145
snow15145 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 15 03:29:31 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124573
I've been thinking lately of what experiments Voldemort could have
used that saved his sorry self. I'm thinking the dark mark could be a
fine possibility. Voldemort is connected with every deatheater
through the dark mark, when he touches any mark all the deatheaters
are summoned, physically feeling scorching pain. The deatheaters
acknowledged his bodily existence through the dark marks change in
color and appearance before they were ever aware that he was back.
"There. The Dark Mark. It is not as clear as it was an hour or so
ago, when it burned black
[ ] It was a means of distinguishing one
another, and his means of summoning us to him. [ ] This mark has
been growing clearer all year." GOF pg. 710 (all canon is U.S.
version)
Could Voldemort be aware of his deatheaters non-allegiance to him via
the dark mark and the reason as to why, even though they are not
physically present?
"And here we have six missing Death Eaters
[ ] One, too cowardly to
return
[ ] One, who I believe has left me forever
[ ] and one, who
remains my most faithful servant
" GOF pg. 651
I suppose you could argue that Voldemort had been informed of these
particular deatheaters but what about Regulus or Karkaroff?
"Well, you don't just hand in your resignation to Voldemort. It's a
lifetime of service or death." OOP pg. 112
Why cant you just hand in resignation or run like the dickens to a
far off place
the U.S. perhaps. Could it be that Voldemort had a more
physical attachment to his deatheaters through the dark mark?
Voldemort wouldn't have gone to all the trouble of burning an
insignia just for a summoning tool. I like to think of Hermione here
when she said she used the same type of charm (Protean Charm OOP pg.
398) on the galleons as Voldemort did with the dark mark but also the
contract that unbeknownst to all parties who signed it had an
attachment of loyalty. Sounds quite familiar. (That little bitch
oops
I mean witch
what all Does she know about Voldemort's magic and the
dark mark) If you think about Hermione's DA contract as a physically
binding agreement (i.e. if you don't abide by the contract there are
physical consequences) and then apply it to the dark mark I think
you'll see my connection.
Hermione used a piece of paper with a binding signature as the
connection but what if Voldemort used himself as the connection in a
way that he is informed through the dark mark of non-allegiance. If
you take that connection one step further, could it be possible that
it was through this dark mark on his followers that may have kept him
alive? Voldemort himself tests the dark mark in the graveyard
immediately to make sure it is still activated after his rebirth.
"It is back," he said softly. "they will all have noticed it
" GOF
pg. 645
Ahuh! What comes next is quite interesting:
He pressed his long white forefinger to the brand on Wormtail's arm.
The scar on Harry's forehead seared with a sharp pain
pg. 645
Voldemort was not touching Harry he was touching the scar on
Wormtail, so why does Harry's scar sear with pain? At the same time
deatheaters everywhere also felt a searing pain in their scar
connection?
Is the dark mark a scar? I never really thought of the dark mark as a
scar but Harry in OOP refers to it as such:
"You know what these remind me of?"
"No, what's that?"
"The Death Eaters' scars. Voldemort touches one of them, and all
their scars burn
" OOP pg. 399
What do we know about scars? Dumbledore tells McGonagall in the first
book "Scars can come in handy." Fudge in GOF claims that he
has "never heard of a curse scar acting as an alarm bell before" But
we have heard of a scar that acts like an alarm bell before, the dark
mark with its searing pain
ding-a-ling Voldy calling
this is not a
test you must apparate instantly or else.
Could it be possible that Voldemort was kept alive by the physical
bond he shares with his deatheaters through the dark mark? If
Voldemort's `being' can be looked at like Hermione's contract, when
each deatheater signed the contract by accepting the dark mark they
unknowingly accepted all conditions to it. The deatheaters became
physically bound to the contract, which in this case is Voldemort. I
think this may be why it is a life sentence to be a deatheater; you
can never just turn in your resignation. Each deatheater is bonded
for life to the contract, which is Voldemort. Voldemort owns their
very lives, literally. The only escape for a deatheater is to break
the bond when that deatheater dies or is killed. But Voldemort is the
opposite of this; he could not die completely as long as he had his
follower's lives indebted to him. Voldemort speaks to his deatheaters
about this bond.
"
We are still united under the Dark Mark, then! Or are we?" GOF pg.
647
(The definitions of unite as a transitive verb means to combine
qualities or traits and the "Latin past participle stem of unire,
literally "to make one," according to the Encarta Dictionary.)
To make it a bit clearer, the deatheaters have a bit of Voldy. We do
know that Tom Riddle had already used this same type of preservation
before by leaving a memory of him in a diary. Voldy again may have
used some essence of himself with each deatheater through the
insignia of the dark mark.
How did Dumbledore know that Voldemort was not completely gone? My
answer is Snape's insignia. (Remember Snape traded sides before the
downfall of Voldemort) Why did Voldemort expect one of his faithful
deatheaters to try and find him, how would any of the deatheaters be
expected to know that he was not vanquished? Again the dark mark was
an indicator to the deatheater. The scar grew clearer as Voldemort
became more corporeal, so when Voldemort became babymort they would
have had some indication of this through the dark marks appearance.
Snape and Karkaroff were both aware via the dark mark that Voldemort
was growing in strength. This to me is an indication that the dark
mark is more than just a summoning tool but a clear connection to
Voldemort.
There could be a definite drawback to this proposal; Voldemort could
never be killed as long as any deatheater remains alive. Then again
there is always the Harry factor. No one is absolutely certain what
part or parts of Voldy were transferred to Harry at Godric's Hollow
but there appears to be some connection between Voldemort touching
Pettigrew's scar and Harry feeling pain in his at the same time in
the graveyard. There is also a hopeful statement from Voldemort to
his deatheaters that can be construed as Voldemort being mortal after
his rebirth.
"But I was willing to embrace mortal life again, before chasing
immortality." GOF pg. 656
Voldemort may have lost that particular portion of the dark mark's
original connection. The reason he may still be alive is more Harry
now than the deatheaters. Voldemort is still alive so why would he
have reason to question it beyond that point. I can feel myself
heading back to the Satellite!Harry theory so I think I'll stop for
now.
Snow
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive