Where does it say that Molly is a pureblood fanatic???
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 26 06:13:09 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 125220
>>Janet Anderson:
>I am the first person to admit that Molly gets on my nerves
sometimes, but I definitely disagree with the people who have
suggested that her family believed in the doctrine of pure blood,
let alone that she herself does.
>On the contrary, we know that:
>1) Molly's brothers, the Prewitts, were *killed* by Voldemort et al
during the first Voldemort War. If they were in agreement with him,
why would they have been killed?<
Betsy:
Regulus Black was killed by Voldemort because he didn't agree with
Voldemort's methods, but Sirius made it clear to Harry that his
family *did* believe in the importance of being a pureblood. The
Noble House of Black was *not* a supporter of Voldemort - not once
they realized his methods.
I'm not suggesting that Molly's family had the same level of blood
pride the Blacks did, but the WW is full of examples of people
placing importance on bloodlines without embracing it with the fervor
of the Death Eaters. (Fudge is another example.)
>>Janet Anderson:
>2) Ron calls Salazar Slytherin a "twisted old loony" for his
beliefs, and says that if wizards hadn't married muggles they would
have died out. Ron, like his siblings, was homeschooled by Molly,
and I think it's fair to assume that the Weasley children learned
their basic values from her as well as from Arthur -- after all, they
spent more time with her, since Arthur was at the Ministry.<
Betsy:
I think that Molly has adopted Arthur's (and Dumbledore's) views on
Muggles, and if she were asked, she'd say Muggles were very nice
people who do the best they can and wizards shouldn't be mean to
them. Of course, a wizard shouldn't mingle either. And there are
hints of pureblooded thinking in Molly's reaction to the werewolf in
Arthur's room, and Ron's own reactions to Lupin and Hagrid.
>>Janet Anderson:
>3) Molly invites Hermione to the Burrow, to dinner at the inn in
Diagon Alley, includes her on her Christmas and Easter list, etc.
with only one hiatus when she believes on Rita Skeeter's authority
that Hermione has been trifling with Harry's affections. (As to why
she believes Rita Skeeter, Molly isn't the best judge of celebrities -
- she admired Gilderoy Lockhart, too.)
<snip>
Betsy:
But this is the same Rita Skeeter who was discussed by the entire
Weasley family as being untrustworthy at the beginning of GoF.
Actually, I think the Rita Skeeter incident is a perfect example of
Molly's bias. She *does* like Hermoine. She just doesn't fully
trust her. I wonder what her reaction to Percy's Muggle-born
girlfriend was like? And I wonder how she'd react to Ron dating
Hermoine (if it ever happens)? I get the sense that deep down Molly
thinks Muggles and Muggle-borns are a bit untrustworthy.
>>Janet Anderson:
>4) If Molly's family had been pureblood believers, or sympathized
with the aims of Voldemort, Lucius Malfoy would probably have said
so. His remarks sound as if he views the Weasley family as a
monolithic entity supporting all that he hates and rejecting all that
he stands for.<
Betsy:
I don't think all purebloods sympathized with Voldemort. And I don't
*think* anyone is suggesting that Molly and her family were as into
blood supremacy as the Malfoys are. Plus, Molly has embraced her
husband's beliefs (at least outwardly). And I think Lucius would
count anyone as a blood traitor who sided with Dumbledore, who has
some *very* liberal views himself.
>>Janet Anderson:
>In short, being called a "blood traitor" by people like Mrs. Black
and Lucius Malfoy can only be to the credit of Molly as well as to
her family.<
Betsy:
To us, the readers, yes. And maybe even to the Weasley children, but
I don't think there's much in canon to suggest exactly *what* Molly's
beliefs are, but there's a fair bit that hint she might not be as
liberal as her husband.
>>Janet Anderson:
>Oh, and I read the remark about "swarming with muggles" as about as
bigoted as complaining about traffic jams and long lines.<
Betsy:
I think the word "swarming" is pretty negative. But my book
(scholastic paperback) says "packed" which is much more benign. Does
the British version say "swarming" or did someone misquote somewhere
down the line?.
Betsy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive