In Defense of Snape (Against Snape in JKR's words)

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 122136


> Betsy:
But if Snape is not redeemed, then he is still a Death Eater. He is 
ESE!Snape, and his constant saving of Harry's life is part of some 
evil complex plot of... evil complexity?
 
No, Snape is definitely redeemed.  He's just not sweet and fuzzy.  I 
don't think he'll ever be sweet and fuzzy (thank goodness).  I do 
hope there is development of his and Harry's relationship.  There is 
so much similarity between those two that it'd be a shame if they 
didn't finally see each others good sides. 



Alla:

NO, Betsy. That is the fundamental difference between how you and me 
see the character of Snape. To me not a DE anymore does not 
equal "being redeemed".

I also maintain that there are enough hints in the text to go with 
doubnle, triple agent Snape, but I am notr eally sure.

Snape as sadist, who enjoys the sufferings of Harry and Neville 
needs redemption, IMO.

I do agree though that Snape and Harry's relationship will be 
developed. I just wonder which way it will go.


Just my opinion,

Alla